Paulson: On the hook?

By Lawrence Delevingne

Wed Apr 21, 2010

Read more:



Weighing Paulson & Co.’s legal liability in the SEC’s Goldman Sachs case, including potential multi-billion dollar RICO claims from losing investors.


Paulson & Co. Inc. wasn’t charged in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s allegations of securities fraud against Goldman Sachs, but the powerful hedge fund is still attracting unwanted attention for helping shape a mortgage-backed security in 2007 that made it $1 billion—and cost other investors the same amount.Some legal experts believe that Paulson could still be sued for its role in creating and betting against a synthetic collateralized debt obligation called ABACUS 2007-AC1, including Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act claims potentially worth billions of dollars. For now, Paulson appears safe. SEC enforcement chief Robert Khuzami recently said, according to the Wall Street Journal, that the hedge fund was not charged because only Goldman was responsible for representing the security to investors.And Paulson has said there’s been no notice of impending civil litigation...

ISSN: 2151-1845 / CDC10004H

Register

By registering you will receive

  • A monthly newsletter on your specified areas of interest
  • A fortnightly update on the sector

Free Trial

Take a trial today and access

  • Performance news, fund launches, regulation changes and people moves
  • Profiles of fund managers, investors and distributors
  • Live league tables
  • Investor mandates


Popular Searches on HFI